Hi renewables guys!
This is the situation as now:
- energy for all 3
- Foundation of Renewable Energy and Sustainability FRES 1
- Sustainable Energy and Development Foundation SEDF 1
- Association of Energy and Sustainability AES 0
- Energy and sustaintability for all 0
- renewable energy association (rea) 0
- you energy 0
- energies sources for sustainability Ass -1
- Energy and Sustainable Development Association ESDA -1
- Energy and Sustainable Development Foundation ESDF -1
- Foundation of Energy and Sustainability FES -1
- Global Energy and Development Association GEDA -1
- Our energy -1
- People’s energy -1
- Renewable energy and Sustainable Development Foundation RESDF -1
- Sustainable Development and Energy Foundation SuDEF -1
- Sustainable Energy and Development Association SEDA -1
Because some of us request to release the name soon, because it’s time to fill modules and sent it to our lawyers to, finally, set up the Foundation: I say:
Could be logic take “energy for all“ as our name. It got no negatives votes and now has +3 votes in balance. almost impossible for others to win.
Can we share this decision?
…if nobody complains in the next 24h… we got it!!!!!!!
so: Energy4All and see u soon!!!!
ciao belli!
Dr.Rao
Fri 27 June 2008 at 5:49 pm
I don´t like that name because it does not represent the activities of the organization. We will do a lot more that only things related with energy.
I prefer
FRES
or in second place
something like
Energy and sustainability for all
Thats my opinion
See ya
Fri 27 June 2008 at 5:58 pm
It’s normal that at the end somebody will be happy somebody else not. for this reasons we apply a pool!!!
as me I prefer you energy: because you can brand it easly, make things like “U’NRG” and the sound is good, and contains the word “you” that give friendness to the reader, and “energy” that evoke something positive… but democracy is democracy!!!
anyway tath’s ok… we can go haead up to the end of the votes.
I think on monday we will have the last official!
vote vote vote!!!
see u
Dr.Rao
Fri 27 June 2008 at 6:32 pm
Although I have not been very active during this process, I would like to add some comments. I think that names like “Foundation for Renewable Energy and Sustainability” or “Sustainable Energy and Development Foundation” represent more accurately what we intend to do. The main problem that I see with the name “Energy for All” is that is restricted only to energy and not with other potential projects related to water, agriculture, etc.
Therefore, this name should be discarded from the options and let only the ones that describe better our intentions.
Regards,
Santiago
Fri 27 June 2008 at 7:36 pm
positive vote
FRES
like FRESh air
jajaj
Fri 27 June 2008 at 11:49 pm
Hi santiago!
What u say is correct. there is the difference between the marketing of a thing and the thing itself.
we can say if structure the foundation called “Foundation for Renewable Energy and Sustainability” that holds the brand “energy for all” that covers only specific fields related with low cost energy production issues.
that’s correct.
but now we need the name, so if you have opinions just express it with votes.
we want the name cames out like a particle in a field: naturally it finds an hole in the field. as a phisic process. has to comes out as expression of our “field” as a group, with different ideas, cultures, backgrounds and passions… guys, we are a very strange association of peoples. we have to be opened each others to gain all the power we have as potential due by this kind of set. and there’s a lot!
vote vote vote!
my negs:
fes
geda
resdf
respect!
dr.rao
Fri 27 June 2008 at 11:59 pm
[...] the previous post for some updates and useful discussions in [...]